Skip to content
 

Your guess. Is the boat rising or falling?

Ten years of the Dow.

Where now?

This story from last Friday’s New York has been bothering me. I wanted to ignore, not share it… But then, I figured, my readers have to see it:

A Historical Cycle Bodes Ill for the Markets By Floyd Norris

AT the turn of the last century, it was widely accepted that American stocks were virtually certain to be good long-term investments. Now, far fewer people are confident of that.

A major reason for the earlier confidence was that in the 15 years from the end of 1984 through the end of 1999, the total return of the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index was more than 740 percent, even after adjusting for inflation. That amounted to a compound annual real return of more than 15 percent.

At the end of 2011, by contrast, the 15-year return – from the end of 1996 – was just 3 percent. And most of those gains came in the first three years of the period. Since the end of 1999, the stock market has not come close to keeping up with inflation.

The first of the accompanying charts shows compound 15-year real returns on stock market investments from the period that ended in 1943 through the one that ended last month.

Note on this chart:  Off the Charts: Similar Cycles for Stocks. The total return, after inflation, of stocks over 15-year periods seems to be repeating the pattern it mapped out decades ago. The compound annual total real return of the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index peaked at more than 15 percent in 1999, and has since fallen to just 3 percent. That peak was similar to the earlier peak, reached in 1964. After that 1964 peak, the stock market lost momentum and then entered a bear market. By 1979, the market had failed to keep up with inflation over the previous 15 years.

Broadly, it appears there is a cycle that is repeating itself, in which the 15-year return tops out at more than 15 percent and then falls precipitously.

In June 1964, the real return over the previous 15 years averaged 15.6 percent a year, the highest that figure had ever been. The stock market did not begin to fall then, but it could no longer maintain the torrid pace, and the 15-year return figures began to decline. On a real total return basis, stock prices hit their highs for the era in late 1968, and by the mid-1970s were in free fall as high inflation combined with a bear market.

By 1979, an investor who bought stocks in 1964, when the market seemed to be a sure moneymaker, had lost money after adjusting for inflation, even after including dividend income.

In the early 1980s, the stock market turned around, and by mid-1997 the 15-year return figure had reached a new high of 15.8 percent.

The second chart overlays the two cycles. The first line goes from the end of 1943 through the end of 1980, when the line was in negative territory. The second one, beginning at the end of 1980, continues through the end of last year.

The match between the lines is far from perfect, but there are significant similarities. If past is prologue, the 15-year return is likely to continue to decline and to turn negative in about four years. That does not necessarily imply that stocks will fall during that period, since that could happen with small gains over the period. And, of course, there is no assurance that history will repeat itself.

It is probably significant that opinion surveys show Americans are more pessimistic than they have been in many years. There is a fear that the American economy is in decline and that this country will be unable to compete with emerging Asian economies, principally China. There was a similar fear in the late 1970s, although then the fear was that the United States could not compete with Japan.

Perhaps overconfidence inspired in part by a strong stock market also played a role in American military history. Within a few years after the 1964 peak for 15-year returns, the United States escalated the Vietnam War. Within a few years after the 1999 peak, the United States decided to invade Iraq.

The other two charts indicate that the stock market may have done surprisingly well over the last 15 years, considering how little the economy grew over that period. Through the third quarter of last year – the most recent data available – real gross domestic product had risen at an annual rate of just 2.3 percent over the previous 15 years. That was the lowest return since the 15 years ending in 1960, a period that was distorted because it included the rapid decline in real gross domestic product in 1946 as the production of weapons halted after World War II.

Similarly, over the last 15 years the total real personal income earned by Americans has risen at an annual rate of just 2.6 percent. That is the lowest for any similar period for which G.D.P. data is available. Both the G.D.P. and personal income rates of growth are well below where they were when the cumulative stock returns bottomed out in 1982.

After the pessimism of the late 1970s and early 1980s, the economy and the stock market turned around as it became clear the American economy was resilient and could adapt to a changing world.

The question now is whether that can happen again.

Credit Card Firms: They Don’t Just Steal From Cardholders. An engrossing story from Bloomberg and Matt Taibbi. If you’re a small business, you must read this. Click here.

The story of pollination. Told in the most wonderful slow motion film presented at Ted. Click here.

Just what you didn’t need.

Oscar de la Renta fox fur, Dr. Dre beats headphones, Only $695.

A cute golf story.
During my physical yesterday, my doctor asked me about my daily activity level, and so I described a typical day:

“Yesterday morning, I waded along the edge of a lake, escaped from wild dogs in the heavy brush, marched up and down several rocky hills, stood in a patch of poison ivy, crawled out of quicksand, and jumped away from an aggressive rattlesnake.”

Inspired by my story, the doctor said, “You must be some outdoors man!”

“No,” I replied, “I’m just an awful golfer.”

The question.
A husband asked his wife: ‘What do you like most in me, my handsome face or my sexy body?’

She looked at him from head to toe and replied:  ‘I love  your sense of humor!’


Harry Newton who is staying in a friend’s tony Las Vegas apartment on the 39th floor and using his Samsung/Verizon 4G/LTE MiFi unit.  I just tested this amazing gadget — 3.86 million bits download and 5.58 million bits upload. That’s faster than a T-1 line we used to pay the phone company several thousand dollars a month. I’m paying Verizon $50 a month for this MiFi magic.

The rolling out of wireless 4G/LTE speeds — by Verizon and AT&T — means not only that we can do our work faster — but, more importantly, we can undertake new tasks. That will have profound implications for our society — from everything like computing in the cloud to the Internet of Things — connected devices that aren’t just today laptops. Lots of new business opportunities.

The Consumer Electronics Show opens this morning. Last night’s 6:50 PM JetBlue from Kennedy to Las Vegas was jammed with iPad- and iPhone-toting passengers and an occasional Lenovo ThinkPad laptop. Not a single Dell or HP. Next year’s will be full of the new Visios being announced this week in Vegas.

A little on what’s not electronic but new at CES from the New York Times. Click here. I’ll walk the some of the floor today. Hopefully find some neat stuff.

5 Comments

  1. Freddie says:

    The S&P 500 is at its highest point in five months, Harry. How's that Vanguard bond fund looking? How's being short on whatever you're shorting now? What's it like to miss the boat – again?

    • HarryNewton says:

      I made a little money on the Dell and RIMM shorts and covered them both. I'm no longer short anything. And I've reported on that. As regards the VWALX Vanguard bond fund, it's doing just fine at present. If and when interest rates start rising, So now I've told you where I stand, what are you doing?

  2. Pahowley says:

    Optimism and pessimism definitely tend to over extend, one up and the other down. Undoubtedly an interesting aspect of human nature involved, and well written about in books and articles. But, I think you have to also look at government economic policies and politics to fully understand cycles and, perhaps today, even more important to understand recoveries. Most somewhat fast, some slower. Why? Maybe, human psychology, but that's often a huge reflection of confidence or not in government and its policies and direction. Our current “recovery” is one of the slowest and weakest recoveries seen since Roosevelt's devastating policies of the late 1930's. That is no accident. Well, OK, it is an accident in its effects on us all! But it is not some casual normal cycle following its natural course, I suggest. Its exaggerated course, down and up, is driven by government policies.

  3. Jack says:

    harry  you need to study the market back 70 years  all bull and bear markets last 14 to 18 years.  this one started oct 20 2000.   if you put it on the '66 to 82 bear it is very similar.  my guess is 2016 we will start the next major bull.  and it will be a hum dimger because we will be starting alot lower then where we are now.