Newton's In Search Of The Perfect Investment. Technology Investor.
Previous
Columns
8:30 AM Friday, December 31, 2004: You
have to be stupid or crazy (or preferably both) to make economic predictions.
Still, here goes for 2005. First, we should understand who we are and our
perspective. We are investors trying to make money in any kind of
market. Hence it's critical to divorce our emotions, our fears of financial disasters
and the like, and replace them with a strategy for coping (or better yet, benefiting).
Guy Rolnik of the Israeli Haaretz International sums it up: "The eyes
of every economist and forecaster in the world are focused on the U.S., on its
huge trade and federal deficits and its reciprocal trade and financial
relationships with China and the Far East. Everyone is convinced that the key
to everything in the global economy this year is hidden in the U.S. and its trade
partners, which are also financing the nation [i.e. the U.S.].
" The problem is that half the experts in the world claim this year
[i.e. 2005] holds an economic and financial crisis in the U.S. that could
result in the collapse of the dollar, a leap in interest rates and slowing [world
economic] growth, while the other half believes the U.S. will make a dramatic
budget cut, allowing it to continue to move forward in symbiosis with its trade
partners."
There's nothing sinister or untoward about the budget and trade deficit mess.
We got into it deliberately and with intelligence. As new President, George W.
Bush inherited the Tech Wreck, a lousy, deteriorating economy, a likely recession
and the prospect of a one-term presidency. (It was the economy that cost his father
a second term.) George W. choose a radical, but guaranteed, course to stave off
the recession and to win a second term -- drop interest rates, drop taxes, raise
spending and print money. The strategy succeeded brilliantly. The recession never
really occurred. Housing boomed. The increased value of America's housing more
than made up for what it lost in stocks (especially tech stocks). The tax cuts
boosted consumer spending. America shopped itself out of a likely recession.
Now the economy is turning around. Jobs are more plentiful. Consumer and business
sentiment is up. If we keep these pump-primping policies, we'll suffer a serious
collapse in the dollar, a leap in interest rates, heady inflation and stop-dead
growth and perhaps a serious financial crisis -- like a 25% overnight drop in
the value of stocks.
I'm not playing politics here. The good news is that the administration actually
understands what's going on. Bush is talking about halving the budget deficit,
a stronger dollar .... and I'm guessing, soon, some tax increases. Friends who
are smarter than me believe that should Bush actually start to get that enormous
Federal Government deficit down, the dollar will rebound and the stock market
will soar. Bush has the power to do it. He has a Republican Congress. He can't
be elected a third time. And he's seriously concerned about his legacy -- handing
off a strong economy to his Republican Party, and his brother.
If you believe
he can and will, then you've got a squirrely first half of 2005 (with a lower
dollar and a lower stockmarket) and a potentially booming economy some time
late next year, early 2006.
Some things have changed fundamentally in our world -- which politics and government
can't affect. They're important to understand because they're now an
integral of the investment scene. There's far more money around than
ever before. I don't know where it all came from. But it's here. There's far
more money around than there are opportunities for that money to be gainfully
employed. Hence, none of us will be earning in yields what we earned in
the past. That's the bad news. The good news is that value of solid money-earning
assets will soar. Item: German investors are snapping up U.S. commercial real
estate at prices much higher than U.S. buyers can tolerate. As the dollar declines
further (and it will -- Buffett has shifted over $20 billion of Berkshire's
money into foreign currencies), many assets here will skyrocket, especially
real estate. That's why I'm snapping up as many syndications of handsome commercial
properties as I can find.
The second thing that's changed is that two gigantic countries -- China and
India -- are taking off. This has three implications. First, they're flooding
America in general (and Wal-Mart in particular) with cheap goods. If your invested
companies are not using China or India, they'll soon be hurting. Second, these
countries are using up more and more of the world's resources, driving commodity
prices sky-high. Watch the price of sugar, cotton and orange juice in coming
months. And three, finally, they're "investing" their earnings in
American government treasuries. Without their money, our interest rates would
have been much higher, which would have hurt real estate, and stymied the recovery.
Thank you Asia for your confidence. There's some discussion of you switching
allegiance to the Euro, away from the dollar. I bet some of this has happened
already. But I bet you're smart enough to know you can't keep bidding the Euro
up and up. You have to recognize that Europe, as an economy, is neither robust
nor flexible, nor deserving of an expensive currency. Its population is too
old. Its labor practices too rigid. It lacks the thriving venture capital and
technology creation environment of the U.S. (and Israel). Yes, the dollar will
fall some more. How much and how soon will depend on politics (see above) and
the Iraq War, which we simply cannot afford much longer. Remember the one critical
original premise of the War was that the rehabilitation of postwar Iraq would
be paid by Iraqi oil revenues. Yet, despite a 37% increase in the price
of oil in 2004, the administration keeps begging more and more money out of
Congress. It's money which worsens our deficit and drives up the price of precious
products in the U.S., like plywood. Increasingly I worry about the "Iraqi
Payoff."
James Dobbins is Director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center
at Rand. He was a U.S. Special Envoy in Kosovo, Bosnia, Haiti, Somalia, and
Afghanistan. He writes in the Jan-Feb, 2005 issue of Foreign Affairs, "The
recent American presidential campaign has had the perverse effect of postponing
any serious national debate on the future U.S. course in Iraq. Electoral considerations
placed a premium on consistency at the expense of common sense, with both candidates
insisting that even with perfect hindsight they would have acted just as they
did two years ago: going to war or voting to authorize doing so. The campaign
also revealed the paucity of good options now before the United States. Keeping
U.S. troops in Iraq will only provoke fiercer and more widespread resistance,
but withdrawing them too soon could spark a civil war. The second administration
of George W. Bush seems to be left with the choice between making things worse
slowly or quickly. The beginning of wisdom is to recognize that the ongoing
war in Iraq is not one that the United States can win. As a result of its initial
miscalculations, misdirected planning, and inadequate preparation, Washington
has lost the Iraqi people's confidence and consent, and it is unlikely to win
them back. Every day that Americans shell Iraqi cities they lose further ground
on the central front of Iraqi opinion. ...
In the eyes
of the Iraqi people and of all the neighboring populations, the U.S. mission
in Iraq lacks legitimacy and credibility. Only by dramatically recasting the
American role in the region can such perceptions begin to be changed. Until
then, U.S. military operations in Iraq will continue to inspire local resistance,
radicalize neighboring populations, and discourage international cooperation."
I can't imagine that Bush, so concerned now about his "legacy"
would want to perpetuate the present mess in Iraq. But I worry that widespread
political pressures to end this war may still be years, many lives and billions
of dollars away. It took years for effective political resistance to build up
against an earlier, equally debilitating war -- the one in Vietnam. Ironically,
Vietnam has now become a popular tourist attraction for all my rich Republican
friends -- the ones who supported that war. I can see that happening here. Iraq
has some neat biblical sites, a few of which haven't been destroyed. Personally,
I'd like to see Iraq broken into three countries -- Kurd, Shiite and Sunni --
have us leave asap, irrespective of the likelihood of a civil war. For now,
Iraq will become a ever larger drain on the US's resources and growth. Sadly,
I can't predict any immediate solution. I don't see a serious reduction in the
federal government's deficit until this sore is cured. Maybe Bush will pull
off a miracle, or recognize the Iraqi folly.
None of this denies
us investors moneymaking opportunities. Whether shorting the dollar, investing
in commodities, investing in real estate or playing speculative stocks, all
the standard caveats remain: Research, care, research and more; tight
stop losses, should the tide turn against you. And cash for great opportunities,
should they come along -- e.g. distressed real estate. And plenty of cash to
tide you through a financial downturn. If the administration doesn't move fast
enough, there is a possibility, perhaps as high as 20% -- that we will have
a serious financial crisis, with an overnight 25% loss in the value of equities,
a two to three hundred basis point rise in interest rates, tenants reneging
on their rents, etc.
For now:
1. The dollar
will decline more. Short it. Invest in overseas stock funds. Vanguard and
T. Rowe Price have some interesting ones.
2. Short-term interest rates will rise. But long-term ones will stay
roughly where they are today.
3. Oil has made its move -- up 37% for the year. It remains the investment
of speculators. Not a game I understand or can afford to play.
4. Housing will boom in those areas where demand for housing is way higher
than supply, e.g. Southern California.
5. Commodities will boom. The best to invest in are those we consume
(sugar, cotton, OJ), not those we speculate in (gold, silver, platinum). I just
bought Jimmie Rogers new book on commodities.
6. The Internet will continue to take more and more of retail sales.
Choose carefully. One of my private equity deals -- which sells exclusively
on the Internet -- may IPO this year. I may finally make some money on that
private equity -- but only after every investment they made -- bar one -- collapsed.
That one may bail us out, yet. I'm praying.
7. IPOs are coming, even more than last year. Some represent decent value.
Searching them as they come is a good source of opportunities.
8. There'll always be hot stocks, like Taser, Interchange or the Chinese
Internet stocks. Because there's so much money chasing so few opportunities,
there'll always be money around for madness. Ride them while they last. Which
is usually not long. I'll keep highlighting as I find them.
9. Small stocks will continue do much better than large stocks, which
stumble more than they sprint. I'm actually looking at a couple of Vanguard's
small and mid-cap mutual funds. Here are the top five money destroyers (courtesy
BubbleVision-- CNBC) of 2004:
| |
Lost
market capitalization
|
|
| Pfizer |
$70
billion
|
down
26%
|
| Intel |
$61
billion
|
down
29%
|
| Cisco |
$40
billion
|
down
24%
|
| Merck |
$32
billion
|
down
31%
|
| Coca-Cola |
$23
billion
|
down
19%
|
Thank God, I never
recommended any of these five. In fact, I was pretty nasty to most of them,
especially Coca Cola and Intel.
Nimbleness is
the key to 2005. When wasn't it?
Reader
Howard Mount offers these predictions:
1) Cash still remains King
2) Munis will be lackluster, with talk and the possibility not allowing State
income deductions from Fed taxes
3) Bonds will be a bad place to invest next year (except ultra-short)
4) Small caps will still outperform large caps until latter part of year (small
caps are underfollowed and underowned by the institutions compared to mega caps)
Foreign stocks will continue to do well the 1Q of 2005 but after that ??
5) Unfortunately I think the potential for a terrorist car bombing will come
to the US
6) Defense stocks will continue to do well in 2005 as will the metals
7) My barber and UPS driver will finally stop talking about stocks and giving
me tips
8) I think the markets will end 2005 down 10-15% (could be conservative and
I could be off by one year! but 2005-2006 not a good time in the markets IMHO)
9) It will still be a traders market of take your profits and run!!
10) Did I say Cash is still KING, but at least we will be paid more while we
wait
11) I am pretty sour on 2005 and I could be wrong! But there are too many BULLS
out there! I'm just a very cynical person when it comes to Wall Street and all
those cheerleaders on "Bubblevision"
A story for tonight, New Year's Eve
Two buddies, Rog & Doc, are getting very drunk at The Stables
(new place in Denver)when suddenly Roger throws up all over himself. "Oh,
no... Now Barb will kill me!"
Doc says, "Don't
worry, pal. Just tuck a twenty in your breast pocket and tell your wife that
someone threw up on you and gave you twenty dollars for the dry cleaning bill."
So they stay for
another couple of hours and get even drunker. Eventually Rog stumbles home and
Barb starts in. "You reek of alcohol and you've puked all over yourself!
My God, you're disgusting! Yada, Yada, Yada."
Speaking very
carefully so as not to slur his words, Rog says, "Nowainaminit, I can e'splain
everythin Itsh snot whatcha think. I only had a cupla drrrinks. But thiss other
guy got ssick on me...he had one too many! and he juss koudin hold hizz liquor.
He said he was verrry sorry an' gave me twennie bucks for the cleaning bill!"
Barb looks in
the breast pocket and says, "But this is forty bucks.."
"Oh, yeah...
I almos' fergot, he shhhit in my pants, too."
We
did OK in 2004.
We made a little money. That was good.
But most importantly, we said NO to a lot of disasters we avoided. They would
have cost us big-time.
All in all a good year. Michael got a job. Claire got into law school. We moved
apartments. Susan is happier. My tennis improved, a little. Better yet, we're
all alive and healthy.
Enjoy tonight. Kiss the spouse, the parents, the grandparents, the children...
Hug the friends.

Harry Newton
This column is about my personal search for the perfect investment. I don't
give investment advice. For that you have to be registered with regulatory authorities,
which I am not. I am a reporter and an investor. I make my daily column -- Monday
through Friday -- freely available for three reasons:
Writing is good for sorting things out in my brain. Second, the column is research
for a book I'm writing called "In Search of the Perfect Investment."
Third, I encourage my readers to send me their ideas, concerns and experiences.
That way we can all learn together. My email address is .
You can't click on my email address. You have to re-type it . This protects
me from software scanning the Internet for email addresses to spam.
I have no role in choosing the Google ads. Thus I cannot endorse any, though
some look mighty interesting. If you click on a link, Google may send me money.
That money will help pay Claire's law school tuition. Read more about Google
AdSense, click
here and here.
Go back.
|