![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.technologyinvestor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/05\/National-Debt-GDP.gif\" "\\"National-Debt-GDP\\"")
<\/a><\/p>\nWhat’s got me most excited is the U.S. innovation engine keeps chugging along. In fact, with technology and the Internet, it’s moved into warp overdraft.<\/p>\n
Morgan Stanley has upgraded Apple. <\/span><\/strong>The target now is $310, though I recently saw a target of $400 a share from someone else. \u00a0Morgan Stanley says 58% of iPhone customers expect to upgrade their iPhone in the next year, far higher than the 18% upgrade rate in 2008 — a difference of 18 million units globally in CY11. Morgan Stanley assumes a 30% global upgrade rate in its base case, 50% in its bull case.The new iPhone 4G is coming out in June or July. There are strong rumors that Verizon will sell the new phone. You can find more on the new iPhone here.<\/a><\/strong> I’ve still got my Apple shares and am praying that Morgan Stanley is right, though I don’t put much faith in my prayers.<\/p>\n Watch what you copy:<\/span><\/strong> A recent CBS report noted that many copiers contained hard drives filled with images of every document they\u2019d ever copied. Often, owners don\u2019t wipe these hard drives clean before selling the machines or returning them to the leasing company. It’s real easy to read sensitive information like Social Security numbers and medical records and hence to have it fall into the wrong hands.<\/p>\n CBS and the founder of a company that sells software to delete data on copier hard drives purchased four old copiers from a warehouse in New Jersey and found loads of sensitive data stored in the copiers.<\/p>\n Copiers with hard drives tend (I believe) to be larger and newer. I’m not sure there’s any definitive way of knowing if it’s got a hard drive — short of opening the thing. Be wary what you copy. Or buy yourself a cheap all-in-one machine for your home.<\/p>\n The Internet continues to generate immense wealth. \u00a0Go to <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong>Groupon. Sign up. You’ll see discounts (often 50%+) at some local stores. \u00a0You buy a deal. The supplier gets some of the money; Groupon gets the rest. It’s a cash cow. Groupon is now worth something like $1. 5 billion, based on its latest money-raise valuation. \u00a0Visit Groupon.<\/a> <\/strong>It doesn’t cost anything if you don’t buy. Personally, I’m not attracted to what they’re selling. But I am attracted to the valuation.<\/p>\n Gold is rising. <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/strong>May 24 (Bloomberg) — Speculators are buying gold faster than the world\u2019s biggest producers can mine it as analysts forecast a 27 percent rally that may extend the longest run of annual gains since at least 1920.<\/p>\n For the full Bloomberg story, click here.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n With newspapers ebbing, experiments abound.<\/span><\/strong> The latest is Honolulu Civil Beat. It\u2019s a new venture by the eBay founder Pierre Omidyar and Rupert Murdoch\u2019s Times of London. Click Civilbeat.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Warren Buffett’s latest stock holdings.<\/span> <\/strong>The holdings are as of December 31. No dramatic change. Click here for Buffett’s \u00a0portfolio.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Wall Street’s business is creating products to sell to you and me. Unlike micromini-dresses (see below) these products are neither pleasing nor profitable. I’ve written about auction rate preferreds, structured investment vehicles, etc. many times. Some people claim that none of Wall Street’s creations of the past ten years made anyone any money, except Wall Street. Anyway, here’s another one from Gretchen Morgenson writing in Sundays New York Times:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n \u2018100% Protected\u2019 Isn\u2019t as Safe as It Sounds <\/span><\/strong> Questions about how Wall Street marketed yet another complex product, sold as solid and secure, are now emerging in investor arbitration cases. The instrument is named, inaptly as it turns out, \u201c100 percent principal protected absolute return barrier notes.\u201d<\/p>\n These securities are essentially zero-coupon notes sweetened by tying the return, in part, to the performance of an equity index, like the Standard & Poor\u2019s 500 or the Russell 2000. The securities promise to return an investor\u2019s principal, typically at the end of 18 months, with the added gain from the index\u2019s performance if that index trades within a certain range. Brokerage firms often issued these securities.<\/p>\n For an investor in one of these notes to earn the return of the index as well as get the principal back, the index cannot fall 25.5 percent or more from its level at the date of issuance. Neither can it rise more than 27.5 percent above that level. If the index exceeds those levels during the holding period, the investors receive only their principal back.<\/p>\n Convoluted enough for you?<\/p>\n Yet, these securities appear to have been sold to conservative individuals whose financial market forays were usually limited to certificates of deposit. Many of these investors, to their great misfortune, bought principal-protected notes issued by Lehman Brothers. They are now worth pennies on the dollar.<\/p>\n CORINNE and Gregory Minasian were two of these investors who, at the suggestion of their broker at UBS, sunk almost $100,000 \u2014 more than half of their savings \u2014 into Lehman notes in early 2008. They lost everything and have filed an arbitration case against the firm to recover their losses.<\/p>\n The Minasians are a retired couple who live on Long Island. They contend that their UBS broker pushed the investment when one of their C.D.\u2019s matured. The broker failed to explain the risks in the security, the Minasians said, and did not provide them with a prospectus. They did not even know their investment had been issued by Lehman Brothers until the firm collapsed.<\/p>\n \u201cI am not a sophisticated investor,\u201d said Mr. Minasian, a former engineer who is 68. \u201cMany years ago I dabbled in the stock market, but I learned my lessons. Over the past 10 to 15 years my wife and I invested in C.D.\u2019s.\u201d<\/p>\n But that approach changed in January 2008, when, according to the Minasians, their UBS broker began calling with an investment idea \u2014 principal-protected notes. \u201cWe questioned him over and over,\u201d Mr. Minasian said. \u201cWe initially told him we weren\u2019t sure and that we wanted to think it over. Maybe the next day he called us and told us he was putting his father into the same notes and his father is very conservative.\u201d<\/p>\n The Minasians said they decided to buy the instrument because they were assured by UBS, a financial adviser they had dealt with for years, that it was safe. The thing was called a \u201cprincipal protected\u201d note, after all.<\/p>\n Eight months later, Lehman went bankrupt. The note was virtually worthless.<\/p>\n Mrs. Minasian, 67, said she and her husband did not receive notice of problems with the investment until mid-October, when they received a form letter from UBS saying the value of their investment was \u201cunavailable.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cI opened the letter and said, \u2018Why are we getting this?\u2019 \u201d Mrs. Minasian said. \u201cAs I read it and we were wondering if it in fact did pertain to us, my heart sank. I almost fell on the floor.\u201d<\/p>\n UBS sold $1 billion of these notes to investors. Commissions were 1.75 percent, far higher than those generated on sales of C.D.\u2019s. When Mr. Minasian asked about the commission, he says, his broker said there was none.<\/p>\n A spokeswoman for UBS, Karina Byrne, said, \u201cUBS properly sold Lehman structured products to UBS clients, following all regulatory requirements, well-established sales practices and client disclosure guidelines.\u201d Client losses, she added, were the result of the \u201cunprecedented failure\u201d of Lehman Brothers.<\/p>\n Jacob H. Zamansky, the securities lawyer representing the Minasians, filed an arbitration claim against UBS on their behalf in late March. He says he has two dozen investors across the country telling similar stories of brokers recommending these securities without any explanation of their risks. Some UBS brokers are also telling him that they, too, feel they were misled about the risks in these securities.<\/p>\n \u201cThese are very opaque products that should not be sold to individual investors,\u201d Mr. Zamansky said. \u201cNobody understands what the product is.\u201d<\/p>\n In the Minasians\u2019 complaint, they also contend that UBS was in a position to have known that Lehman was in trouble and therefore should not have sold the securities to investors. According to the report of the Lehman bankruptcy examiner, UBS was one of the firms that helped Lehman conduct its now-infamous Repo 105 transactions, helping it mask the leverage it had on its books.<\/p>\n Ms. Byrne said that the examiner\u2019s report did not suggest that the banks that conducted those trades acted inappropriately.<\/p>\n As Lehman\u2019s cash crisis grew in the spring of 2008, it ramped up the issuance of these notes. But some brokers at UBS stopped selling Lehman Brothers notes at this time, Mr. Zamansky said.<\/p>\n He said some inside UBS seemed to recognize that Lehman was vulnerable. In March 2008, for example, after Bear Stearns collapsed, a UBS analyst wrote of the \u201charsh reality that some investors will think of Lehman as next on the list for the confidence\/liquidity crisis.\u201d<\/p>\n The Minasians were not advised about any of these matters, Mr. Zamansky said. Now the retirees are unsecured creditors awaiting a minuscule payout in the Lehman bankruptcy.<\/p>\n \u201cIf the inner workings and true risks of these notes were ever honestly disclosed, no retail investor would buy one,\u201d Mr. Zamansky said. He has asked for a full recovery of the Minasians\u2019 losses from UBS.<\/p>\n THE Securities Litigation and Consulting Group, a financial economics consulting firm, analyzed 14 issues of these principal-protected notes and found that more than half of them carried a yield of less than 2 percent. More than half the time, the analysis concluded, \u201cInvestors would be better off investing in Treasury securities.\u201d<\/p>\n Add these securities to the growing pile of Wall Street inventions that benefit … wait for it, wait for it … Wall Street.<\/p>\n Fed up with your day job? Try matador. A day after dashing Spanish bullfighter Julio Aparicio showed his dominance by cutting the ears off two vanquished bulls, one of their bovine brothers got revenge:<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n The bull impaled Aparicio through his throat and out of his mouth. Aparicio is alive, following two operations by Dr. Maximo Garcia. The goring took place during the Festival of Saint Isidro at the Plaza de Toros Las Ventas in Madrid. \u00a0 You can watch a YouTube video of it. Watch till the end. If you have the stomach, click here.<\/a><\/strong><\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n
\nBy GRETCHEN MORGENSON of the New York Times.
\nBROKERS selling complex securities that they once contended were safe and sound have saddled individual investors with billions in losses since the credit bubble burst. Remember auction-rate securities? Those were peddled to investors as just as good as cash \u2014 until they no longer were after that market seized up in 2008.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n