Hopefully our shares will also crash, giving us a great opportunity to buy quality cheap.<\/p>\n
Advice: Do not sell into this. Do not get stopped out.<\/strong><\/p>\n Today’s nuclear meltdown is a perfect example of why your stops should not be sitting out there already in place — waiting for some sneaky trader to drive down your prices, grab your shares and then run your stocks up.<\/p>\n Today is the Ides of March.<\/p>\n The Ides of March is best known as the date that Julius Caesar was killed in 44 B.C.<\/p>\n Caesar was stabbed 23 times in the Roman Senate led by Marcus Junius Brutus, Gaius Cassius Longinus and 60 other conspirators.<\/p>\n On his way to the Theatre of Pompey (where he would be assassinated), Caesar saw a seer who had foretold that harm would come to him not later than the Ides of March.<\/p>\n Caesar joked, “Well, the Ides of March have come.”<\/p>\n The seer replied “Ay, they have come, but they are not gone.”<\/p>\n This meeting is dramatized in William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar.<\/p>\n Caesar is warned to “Beware the Ides of March<\/strong>“<\/p>\n Warren Buffett on derivatives:<\/strong><\/span> From the New York Times:<\/p>\n Derivatives, as Accused by Buffett<\/strong> Warren E. Buffett\u2019s \u201celephant gun\u201d and itchy \u201ctrigger finger\u201d may be the market chatter, after Berkshire Hathaway announced a $9 billion deal to buy Lubrizol on Monday.<\/p>\n But Wall Street denizens have been focused on something else in recent days: Mr. Buffett\u2019s private interview before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, a transcript of which has been whizzing around e-mail inboxes.<\/p>\n Mr. Buffett, in a two-hour interview transcribed by the newsletter Santangel\u2019s Review, touched on everything from ratings agencies to the dangers of leverage.<\/p>\n But the most provocative moments centered on derivatives, the complicated investments at the heart of the financial crisis. It is perhaps the first time that Mr. Buffett has opened up so publicly about the topic.<\/p>\n Mr. Buffett once described derivatives as \u201cfinancial weapons of mass destruction.\u201d Yet some of his most ardent fans have quietly raised eyebrows at his pontifications, given that he plays in the opaque market. In the fourth quarter alone, Berkshire made $222 million on derivatives. TheStreet.com published a column last spring with the headline: \u201cWarren Buffett Is a Hypocrite.\u201d<\/p>\n His comments, which were released last month by the financial crisis commission, come as the government is writing rules for derivatives as part of the Dodd-Frank financial regulatory overhaul. And the statements could influence the debate.<\/p>\n Mr. Buffett appeared to backpedal from his oft-quoted line, explaining: \u201cI don\u2019t think they\u2019re evil per se. It\u2019s just, they, I mean there\u2019s nothing wrong with having a futures contract or something of the sort. But they do let people engage in massive mischief.\u201d<\/p>\n The problems arise, Mr. Buffett said, when a bank\u2019s exposure to derivatives balloons to grand proportions and uninformed investors start using them.<\/p>\n It \u201cdoesn\u2019t make much difference if it\u2019s, you know, one guy rolling dice against another, and they\u2019re doing $5 a throw. But it makes a lot of difference when you get into big numbers.\u201d<\/p>\n What worries him most is the big financial institutions that have millions of contracts. \u201cIf I look at JPMorgan, I see two trillion in receivables, two trillion in payables, a trillion and seven netted off on each side and $300 billion remaining, maybe $200 billion collateralized,\u201d he said, walking through his thinking. \u201cThat\u2019s all fine. But I don\u2019t know what discontinuities are going to do to those numbers overnight if there\u2019s a major nuclear, chemical or biological terrorist action that really is disruptive to the whole financial system.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWho the hell knows what happens to those numbers?\u201d he asked. \u201cI think it\u2019s virtually unmanageable.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Buffett defended Berkshire Hathaway\u2019s use of derivatives, arguing that the company maintains a limited amount. At the time of the interview, the company had only about 250 derivative contracts. (It\u2019s now down to 203.) \u201cI want to know every contract, and I can do that with the way we\u2019ve done it. But I can\u2019t do it with 23,000 that a bunch of traders are putting on.\u201d<\/p>\n He noted that when Berkshire bought General Re in 1998, the reinsurance company had 23,000 derivative contracts. \u201cI could have hired 15 of the smartest people, you know, math majors, Ph.D.\u2019s. I could have given them carte blanche to devise any reporting system that would enable me to get my mind around what exposure that I had, and it wouldn\u2019t have worked,\u201d he said to the government panel. \u201cCan you imagine 23,000 contracts with 900 institutions all over the world with probably 200 of them names I can\u2019t pronounce?\u201d Berkshire decided to unwind the derivative deals, incurring some $400 million in losses.<\/p>\n Mr. Buffett said he used derivatives to capitalize on discrepancies in the market. (That\u2019s what other investors must think they are doing \u2014 just not as successfully.)<\/p>\n Perhaps the most insightful nugget in the interview was Mr. Buffett\u2019s explanation of why corporations use derivatives \u2014 and why they probably shouldn\u2019t.<\/p>\n Many companies, as diverse as Coca-Cola and Burlington Northern, argue that they employ derivatives to hedge their risk.<\/p>\n The United States-based Coca-Cola tries to protect against fluctuations in currencies since it does business around the world. Burlington Northern, the railroad giant, uses the investments to limit the effect of fuel prices.<\/p>\n Mr. Buffett, who has interests in both companies, claimed there was another agenda. \u201cThe reason many of them do it is that they want to smooth earnings,\u201d he said, referring to the idea of trying to make quarterly numbers less volatile. \u201cAnd I\u2019m not saying there\u2019s anything wrong with that, but that is the motivation.\u201d<\/p>\n The numbers all even out eventually, he cautioned, so derivatives don\u2019t really make much difference in the long term.<\/p>\n \u201cThey\u2019re going to lose as much on the diesel fuel contracts over time as they make,\u201d he said of Burlington Northern. \u201cI wouldn\u2019t do it.\u201d<\/p>\n Microsoft releases its updated browser Internet Explorer 9. <\/strong><\/span>Pick your free copy up here.<\/a><\/strong> Apparently IE9 it works and faster. I personally prefer Firefox.<\/p>\n IE 9 supports the HTML5 technology for playing video, thus dealing another\u00a0 blow to Adobe Systems\u00a0 (ADBE)\u2019s Flash — the most popular software for watching video clips on the Internet.<\/p>\n Apple has limited the use of Flash on its iPhone and iPad, endorsing HTML5 also.\u00a0 Steve Jobs said Flash was too slow to run on mobile devices. Frankly, I think it’s too slow to run on computers also.<\/p>\n Microsoft (MSFT) rose 1 cent to $25.69 yesterday. The shares have fallen 8 percent this year.<\/p>\n Do not buy shares in Microsoft.<\/p>\n The family is hooked on Sonicare toothbrushes.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n \n But the things are ultra-expensive and useless for overseas travel. The charger only works here.<\/p>\n Good news:\u00a0 I just discovered Philips makes a battery-powered<\/strong> Sonicare, which uses two AA batteries. List on the thing is $29.95. I got mine from Walgrens for $20. Amazon has it for $25. Click here.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Indian Wells (California) Tennis.<\/strong><\/span> All the tennis greats are here for the BNP Paribas tournament. It’s on The Tennis Channel for most of the day. We’re going today.<\/p>\n Our economy must be doing OK.\u00a0 The tournament is\u00a0 sold out on most days. Tickets are not cheap. (I’m not bragging.)<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.technologyinvestor.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/03\/300px-Cesar-sa_mort.jpg\" "\\"300px-Cesar-sa_mort\\"")
<\/a>
\nVincenzo Camuccini, Mort de C\u00e9sar<\/em>, 1798, courtesy Wikipedia.<\/p>\n
\nBy ANDREW ROSS SORKIN
\nAndrew Harrer\/Bloomberg News Warren E. Buffett spoke to the financial crisis panel.<\/p>\n<\/a><\/p>\n