Harry Newton's In Search of The Perfect Investment
Newton's In Search Of The Perfect Investment. Technology Investor.
Previous
Columns
8:30 AM EST, Friday, April 6: Take
some money home. Take enough home so you can live on the average 10% each year
you might earn in a mix of conservative index funds and conservative hedge funds,
i.e. one which don't use leverage. I used to think it made sense to have more
money in bonds as you got older. But, bonds make little sense, given the returns
available long-term from equities and equity funds chosen intelligently and
conservatively.
Mercedes'
great investment: Daimler (i.e. Mercedes) bought Chrysler for $35
billion in 1988. Kirk Kerkorian has now offered to buy it for $4.5 billion
in cash. Before his offer, Wall Street figured Daimler might get between nothing
(give it away so long as someone else takes the liabilities) to between $5 billion
and $7 billion. If Daimler sells it to Kerkorian. That means they will have
lost 87% on that deal. I figure that's in line with what the company
which bought my business has enjoyed also.
The problem with
mergers and acquisitions is most don't work. There are two reasons:
1. Radically
different management cultures. There's a huge difference between Mercedes
and Chrysler. There's a huge difference between entrepreneurial Harry's business
and the staid English public company that bought my business.
2. Huge changes in the business environment. In Chrysler's case, Americans
have recently preferred fuel-efficient cars. Chrysler stayed with gas gusslers.
And Mercedes forgot that Chrysler was no Mercedes. Chrysler didn't have the
Mercedes brand. In my case, print died. Advertising of technology products switched
to the web. There were ways of boosting revenues, but you have to be entrepreneurial.
My buyer wasn't. They bought and sold media assets, a vastly different business
to managing them.
The
genius of Buffett. What faces the newspaper
business? Writes Warren Buffett in his latest Berkshire Hathaway annual report
(and quoted yesterday in the Wall Street Journal):
The
economic potential of a newspaper Internet site -- given the many alternative
sources of information and entertainment that are free and only a click away
-- is at best a small fraction of that existing in the past for a print
newspaper facing no competition. We are likely therefore to see non-economic
individual buyers of newspapers emerge, just as we have seen such buyers acquire
major sports franchises.
What he means is
rich people buying newspapers (and magazines) as playthings. Hence Sam Zell bidding
for the Tribune.
Always
expect the unexpected: I've written about the
unpredictability of predicting, and how diversification is the most potent weapon
against unpredictability. This neat piece from the latest issue of Wired
magazine:
From
Wall Street to Washington we're constantly being told that the future can
be forecast, that the world is knowable and that the risk can be measured
and managed. Nassim Nicholas Taleb is having none of this. In his new book
The Black Swan, the finance guru and author of the surprise hit, Fooled
by Randomness argues that history is dominated not by the predictable
but by the highly improbable - disruptive, unforeseeable events that Taleb
calls Black Swans. The effects of wars, market crashes and radical technological
innovations are magnified precisely because they confound our expectations
of the universe as an orderly place. In a world of Black Swans, the first
step is understanding just how much we will never understand. -- James
Surowiecki.
Wired:
If Black Swans are the crucial determining events in history, why do we think
we can predict anything at all?
Taleb: After they happen, in retrospect,
we think that Black Swans were predictable. We think that if we can explain
why something happened in the past, we can explain what will happen in the
future.
But
with better models and more computational power, won't we get better at predicting
Black Swans?
We know from chaos theory that even if you had a perfect model of the world,
you'd need infinite precision in order to predict future events. With sociopolitical
or economic phenomena, we don't have anything like that. And things are getting
worse, not better, because of the growing complexity of the world dwarfs any
improvement in sophistication or computational power.
So
what do we do? If we can't forecast the really important things, how do we
act?
You need to
ask, "If the Black Swan hits me, will it help me or hurt me?" You
cannot figure out the probability of a Black Swan hitting. But if you're in
a business that's prone to negative Black Swans, like catastrophe insurance,
I advise you not to take your forecasting seriously -- and to think about
getting into a different business. You don't want to be a sucker. What you
want are situations where you can have as much of the good uncertainty as
possible, where nothing too bad can happen to you, and where you what I call
free options. All of technology, really, is about maximizing free options.
It's like venture capital. Most of the money you make is from things you weren't
looking for. But you find them only if you search.
Is one of
the strengths of the American system that, relatively speaking, it's more
comfortable with uncertainty?
Yes. People
here aren't afraid of failure. They're willing to trade the possibility of
failure for the chance at a big upside. No other country is willing to do
this. What America does best is produce the ability accept failure.
More
than two million documents will be lost by the IRS this year. That
means yours will also. Then you'll be hit with penalties and withholding tax and
all sorts of horrible and nasty things. The IRS will ask for your docs again,
and again. You can send your docs in by certified, return receipt, by FedEx, by
DHL.... You can also drop your forms off at an IRS and have them rubber stamp
each page, "Received." But nothing will do you any good until they have
your return in hand and have processed it. Think glacial.
My
son caught me feeding Winnie (his dog) this morning. I gave her the
remains of my morning cereal. I'm forbidden to give her table food.

Winnie, begging for food, as usual.
My son was not pleased. He quipped, "There are no bad dogs, only bad owners."
The
last golf joke
Last winter Fred met a woman while on vacation in the Keys and fell
madly in love with her. On the last night of his vacation, the two of them went
to dinner at the Ocean View and had a serious talk about how they would continue
the relationship.
"It's only
fair to warn you, I'm a total golf nut," Fred said to his lady friend.
"I eat, sleep and breathe golf, so if that's a problem, you'd better say
so now."
"Well, if
we're being honest with each other, here goes," she replied. "I'm
a hooker."
"I see,"
Fred replied, and was quiet for a moment. Then he said, "You know, it's
probably because you're not keeping your wrists straight when you tee off."
The Irish Candle
Mrs. Donovan was walking down O'Connell Street in Dublin when she
met up with Father Flaherty. The Father said, "Top o' the mornin' to ye!
Aren't ye Mrs. Donovan and didn't I marry ye and yer husband two years ago?"
She replied, "Aye,
that ye did, Father."
The Father asked,
"And be there any wee little ones yet?"
She replied, "No,
not yet, Father."
The Father said,
"Well now, I'm going to Rome next week and I'll light a candle for ye and
yer husband."
She replied, "Oh,
thank ye, Father." They then parted ways.
Some years later
they met again. The Father asked, "Well now, Mrs. Donovan, how are ye these
days?"
She replied, "Oh,
very well, Father!"
The Father asked,
"And tell me, have ye any wee ones yet?"
She replied, "Oh
yes, Father! Three sets of twins and 4 singles, 10 in all."
The Father said,
"That's wonderful! How is yer loving husband doing?"
She replied, "E's
gone to Rome to blow out yer candle!"
The
Sun City Prenuptial Agreement
An elderly couple in their 80s were to marry. .
She: I want to
keep my house.
He: That's fine
with me.
She: And I want
to keep my Cadillac.
He: That's fine
with me.
She: And I want
to have sex 6 times a week.
He: That's fine
with me...Put me down for Fridays..

This column is about my personal search
for the perfect investment. I don't give investment advice. For that you have
to be registered with regulatory authorities, which I am not. I am a reporter
and an investor. I make my daily column -- Monday through Friday -- freely available
for three reasons: Writing is good for sorting things out in my brain. Second,
the column is research for a book I'm writing called "In Search of the
Perfect Investment." Third, I encourage my readers to send me their
ideas, concerns and experiences. That way we can all learn together. My email
address is .
You can't click on my email address. You have to re-type it . This protects
me from software scanning the Internet for email addresses to spam. I have no
role in choosing the Google ads. Thus I cannot endorse any, though some look
mighty interesting. If you click on a link, Google may send me money. Please
note I'm not suggesting you do. That money, if there is any, may help pay Claire's
law school tuition. Read more about Google AdSense, click
here and here.
Go back.
|