Skip to content
 

Microsoft blows millions on dubious, confusing product and software launches

Microsoft’s Surface Tablet Nuttiness. Microsoft is literally spending millions to introduce its Surface Tablet, its new Windows RT and Windows 8 operating systems. One place they’re blowing money bigtime is New York’s Times Square. They’re setting up zillions of  demonstration tables  replete with electricity and huge screens. This was the scene last night:

I gave the gold one $1 for the right to take his picture. Then he cadged another $1 out of me for his friend in silver. They were from the Dominican Republic, which they told me was the greatest country in the world. I guess the U.S. flag was for business.

To capture the full wonders of Times Square, I did a little panoramic movie, using my new Canon G15 and uploaded it to YouTube, which in turn game me some code to embed in this column. I hope it works.

If it doesn’t work, click here.

I haven’t tried the Surface Table, Windows 8 or windows RT. The reviews suggest all of them have major pluses, but the overwhelming effect is total confusion. If you’re interested, probably the best place to start are David Pogue’s articles of today and yesterday in the New York Times. He’s kinder than the computer press. David has just written a book on Windows 8 and clearly would like to sell millions of copies. Here’s today’s piece.  Here’s yesterday’s piece. The headline on this piece is “Sleek tablet but clumsy software.

I have no idea what this all means for Microsoft. I’ll check out the store, the products and the software on Friday when the store opens. Meantime, I don’t think all this promotion money will do anything for the stock. Personally, from what I’ve read, I’m not interested in spending any of my money on these Microsoft products. Microsoft remains tempting short. If these products sell, it won’t be for a long time, when the bugs are out and new software is debuted to make the whole offering more logical and understandable. However, I would like an iPhone 5.

Among the better political articles I’ve read recently:

October 23, 2012
The Hidden Enemy
Obama’s Betrayals: First the Base, Then the Party

by DAVE LINDORFF

We know that there isn’t much “Hope” for “Change” – at least for progressive change – should President Obama win a second term as president.

Even when he had the chance, with Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress during the first two years of his presidency, and with a solid mandate from the voters to act on restoring civil liberties, taking significant action against climate change, ending the wars and defending Social Security and Medicare, he did nothing.

There are some Democrats still caught up in the fantasy, imagining that if the president is re-elected, and doesn’t have another term to worry about, he will finally show his “real colors” and become the progressive they imagined him to be in 2008.

The evidence that this is not the case, though, is clear in the way he is campaigning. You don’t hear, and did not hear in either of the first two presidential debates, any call for voters to give the president a strong Democratic majority in House and Senate. In fact, there was not a word in either of those debates from the president about the importance of getting rid of the Republican control of the House, and of solidifying the Democratic grip on the Senate to prevent Republicans from again blocking any progressive legislation.

If the president really planned on being a progressive, he would have taken the many opportunities handed to him by Romney in those debates, and by questions from the moderator and the audience in the second debate, to blame Republicans in Congress for the failures of his first term, and would have told the 65-70 million viewers to get out there and elect Democrats to Congress – especially progressive Democrats. He had a chance to single out the Democrats in tough races where a win would really have shifted the balance not just to the Democrats, but to the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, for example Elizabeth Warren over Scott Brown in Massachusetts, or Tammy Baldwin over Tommy Thompson in Wisconsin, or Alan Grayson over Todd Long in Florida.

Instead, the president was silent about the congressional races.

What this tells us is two things. One, the president and his staff don’t really care about Congress, and in fact think that the way to win the White House for a second time is to back away from progressive positions as much as possible, in order to win those so-called “middle of the road” voters who, for the most part, are swayed by weird, meaningless things like appearance, demeanor, and image. And two, the president and his handlers probably don’t even want to have a progressive, or even a Democratic majority in Congress, because if they had such a thing, then the president would be compelled to do progressive things in his second term, and he doesn’t really want to do that.

This is a president who is happier coddling corporations, massaging the military-industrial complex, and ignoring the indigent. That’s easy to do when you have a Republican Congress. You can pretend to be a nice progressive guy trying to do the right thing, only to be stymied by the troglodytes in Congress. But if you helped elect those trogs by not fighting for a Democratic majority, it’s really not honest to then blame Congress.

The blame has to be with Obama and his campaign. Instead of making this campaign a movement for real progressive change, it has been a single-minded struggle to re-elect the president – a president who has little to show for his first four years in office, and who is asking for four more years in which he will deliver little more, except for perhaps more military actions, more assaults on the Bill of Rights, and more undermining of the nation’s already shredded social safety net.

I’m not saying things wouldn’t be worst under a President Romney – especially a Romney gifted with a Republican Congress, or a Congress with a Republican House and a Senate with a depleted and further demoralized Democratic majority. But at least with Romney as president, ordinary Americans would quickly be able to identify where the enemy was. With an Obama back in the White House, confusion would continue to reign as the assaults on the New Deal and the Constitution continue, and as the imperialist wars go on, and as the despoilation of the earth continues apace.

Dave Lindorff is a  founder of This Can’t Be Happening and a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, published by AK Press.


Harry Newton who remains wary of this market. Cash and fixed interest instruments have major charms. More on  fixed interest ideas tomorrow.

I ran across all the frenetic Microsoft activity last night after our theater, “Old Jews Telling Jokes.” Recommendation: It’s a fun show. But I wouldn’t pay up for the tickets. There are plenty of places to buy discount tickets. The show started at 7 PM and ended at 9:20 PM, which tells you something about the audience’s age. It was between 65 and death. I fit right in.

12 Comments

  1. AR says:

    Oh it worked. Looks like a crazy place. Thanks for sharing, too.
    Funny how the backround sounds like “Blade Runner”.
    Relax a bit.

  2. Tony says:

    I back Romney for humanitarian reasons. Life is life, and whether a woman acquires that life within her via traditional means or by nature of a rape it is still life and God’s will.

    A vote for Obama is a vote for a butcher. Are we a barbaric society? Let’s hope not.

    • Stephen Sparrow says:

      Rape is real, god is imaginary. Simple. Can an atheist rape victim have an abortion on your planet?

      I heard on the radio today (in Texas no less) that if men could have babies, abortions would be available on the McDonald’s Dollar Menu.

  3. Bruuno says:

    I don’t know how your readers put up with you, Harry- “in the tank” not only for Apple but for Obama…
    one would think you lived in Manhattan and got “infected”.

    • Bruuno says:

      Oldie but Goodie:

      Dear Red States:
      We’re ticked off at your Neanderthal attitudes and politics and we’ve decided we’re leaving.
      We in New York intend to form our own country and we’re taking the other Blue States with us.

      In case you aren’t aware that includes California, Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois and the rest of the Northeast.

      We believe this split will be beneficial to the nation and especially to the people of the new country of The Enlightened States of America (E.S.A).

      To sum up briefly:

      You get Texas, Oklahoma and all the slave states.
      We get stem cell research and the best beaches.
      We get Andrew Cuomo and Elizabeth Warren. You get Bobby Jindal and Todd Akin.
      We get the Statue of Liberty. You get OpryLand.
      We get* Intel* and Microsoft. You get WorldCom.
      We get Harvard, Princeton, Penn, Haverford, Colgate, U of R, You get Ole’ Miss.
      We get 85 percent of America’s venture capital and entrepreneurs.
      You get Alabama.
      We get two-thirds of the tax revenue. You get to make the red states pay their fair share.
      Since our aggregate divorce rate is 22 percent lower than the Christian Coalition’s, we get a bunch of happy families. You get a bunch of single moms.

      With the Blue States in hand we will have firm control of 80% of the country’s fresh water, more than 90% of the pineapple and lettuce, 92% of the nation’s fresh fruit, 95% of America’s quality wines (you can serve French wines at state dinners) 90% of all cheese, 90 percent of the high tech industry, most of the US low sulfur coal, all living redwoods, sequoias and condors, all the Ivy and Seven Sister schools plus Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal Tech and MIT.

      With the Red States you will have to cope with 88% of all obese Americans and their projected health care costs, 92% of all US mosquitoes, nearly 100% of the tornadoes, 90% of the hurricanes, 99% of all Southern Baptists, virtually 100% of all televangelists, Rush Limbaugh, Bob Jones University, Clemson and the University of Georgia.

      We get Hollywood and Yosemite, thank you.

      38% of those in the Red states believe Jonah was actually swallowed by a whale, 62% believe life is sacred unless we’re discussing the death penalty or gun laws, 44% say that evolution is only a theory, 53% that Saddam was involved in 9/11 and 61% of you crazy bastards believe you are people with higher morals than we lefties.

      We’re taking the good weed too. You can have that crap they grow in Mexico.

      Sincerely,

      Citizens of the Enlightened States of America

      • Tony says:

        I couldn’t finish reading past the first two sentences, it felt pretty boring. But I admire all the hard work you apparently put in on this.

      • Mr_Ronald_Reagan says:

        Let me be sure about this now…..you are taking Detroit?……..Bruuno if you’re older than 23 understand that help is available….and by the way, 44% say that evolution is only a theory, I didn’t realize that. I guess you can put me in solidly in the 56% camp,…. I’ve been to both the Bronx and the Bronx Zoo and have no misconceptions whatsoever.

      • You forget….you get the down low, cocaine smoking, pro-Muslim, anti American criminal Barack Hussein al Obama bin Jihadi as well. And, that, reduces whatever you got to ZERO. He will hand it out to his Muslim brothers and his friends in Russia and China, when he has more “flexibility”.

  4. rich says:

    i’m surprise romney don’t push for a rep senate. when pelosi took over in 06, unemployment was 4.6% and when she got booted in ’10 it was 9.1%. also at that time bush had the debt shrinking and she went crazyspending.

  5. dandersen says:

    Walt Mossberg in the WSJ likes Surface. You are in the tank for Apple and should give a disclaimer. Windows 8 may have some glitches but it is a tremendous advance for msft and will end up on machines that cost 50% less than what Apple groupies pay.

  6. mikeyancey says:

    Oh, that Windows tablet is gonna be Zune-tastic!
    I only wish it was available in brown.