Fracking and horizontal drilling is making the New Boom for the 2010s. Just like housing, Internet, telecom, and other stuff before it. And just like other stuff, it will boom, and boom big-time and then bust. Like tulip bulbs.
But along the way, a lot of people will make a lot of money. I hope it’s us.
I pray also that by the end of this decade, America will become energy independent and be able to finally tell Saudi Arabia to shove it.
Meantime, let’s start our journey with words from this weekend’s New York Times Magazine:
The people who run U.S. Steel have not had much reason to celebrate in a long time. Once the icon of American manufacturing, the company became shorthand for the country’s industrial decline. For decades, it ignored innovation and was undercut by cheaper Asian producers and outflanked by U.S. start-ups. Its brief glory in the mid-2000s turned out to be fueled by housing-bubble excess; and its stock price has dropped nearly 90 percent since late 2008. A few months ago, John P. Surma, the company’s chairman and C.E.O., addressed a Steel Hall of Fame event at which all the inductees were either long dead or retired. He noted that, given the business climate, his own generation of steel C.E.O.’s might have trouble getting the big prize themselves.
Fortunately, Surma went on, this misery is about to change. The American steel industry recently received the economic equivalent of a gift from the heavens: natural gas extracted by means of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking. Fracking involves a whole lot of long steel pipes being sunk into rock formations thousands of feet beneath the ground in search of hydrocarbons. U.S. Steel, which is based in Pittsburgh, also happens to be right on top of the Marcellus Shale, the oil-rich formation that stretches from New York to Ohio. No one knows exactly how much gas is down there, but modest estimates suggest it’s at least 100 trillion cubic feet. Given this bounty, U.S. Steel recently spent $100 million on a facility whose entire purpose is to make “tubular product” for gas companies.
For Surma, an even bigger gift should come over the next few decades. The switch from coal to cheaper natural gas will save U.S. Steel hundreds of millions of dollars a year. These savings will be amplified by the fact that the company’s competitors in Europe and Asia will need to pay much more. In fact, many economists say that fracking will soon fundamentally shift global economic logic to uniquely benefit the United States. Ed Morse, an influential energy analyst at Citigroup, argues that the natural-gas industry will bring around three million new jobs to the United States by the end of this decade. He also expects that fracking will add up to 3 percent to our G.D.P. and trillions in additional tax revenue. Along the way, it will turn around perennial stragglers, like steel and manufacturing. For millions of workers, there could not be any better news.
Fracking, of course, is not universally embraced. The State of Pennsylvania lists more than 80 chemicals that are injected into the earth as part of the hydraulic-fracturing process. Many are pretty nasty, including formaldehyde, naphthalene and crystalline silica, which are known to cause all sorts of illnesses, including cancer. Fracking’s early years, more than a decade ago, were similar to the old wildcatter days in California and Texas. Small companies dug quickly and with little constraint from unprepared regulators.
More recently, this has changed considerably. Earlier this year, Ohio passed new rules requiring higher standards for fracking-well construction. Pennsylvania is expected to update its regulations very soon. West Virginia, a state historically friendly to the hydrocarbon industry, passed rules allowing for more public comment before any new wells are dug. New York, the only significant Marcellus Shale state that is still deciding whether to allow fracking, commissioned a panel of independent experts to determine whether the industry, overseen by strict regulation, can operate without hurting citizens. The review is expected early next year.
Most observers would agree, though, that changes in regulation do not come from objective scientific studies. (Both sides, after all, can flood any government hearing with experts and impressive-looking scientific reports.) Regulations are determined, in large part, by politics. And the politics of fracking are changing and are very likely to change drastically in coming years. As examples from the last century suggest, the sudden discovery of oil and gas can transform an entire economy and regulatory system to serve the industry’s interests. Economists call this the resource curse – the perverse process in which a valuable discovery like oil, gas, diamonds or gold ends up enriching a few at the cost of impoverishing most of the population. At its worst, the resource curse leads to deeply corrupt regimes like those in Iraq, Iran, Myanmar and Libya. At its mildest, this can create one-industry economies in which there is little innovation and even less resistance to the whims of a handful of powerful interests. Many believe this already describes the oil economies of Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma and, increasingly, North Dakota, where the fracking industry is entrenched. Politically and economically, it’s hard to argue with an industry that has helped keep the state’s unemployment rate at about 3 percent.
If there is an uneasy equilibrium, right now, between environmentally concerned citizens and pro-fracking industrial groups, what will the political balance be like in a decade? What pressures will be on state legislatures and regulators if the projections are true and the millions of workers in Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia and maybe New York will owe their jobs to fracking. There will be trillions of dollars of new wealth. Will environmental and health concerns have any chance against that juggernaut?
You can read the entire New York Times piece here.
I read and watch a lot. When I recommend something, I’m doing it because it’s good. I don’t recommend crap. Today’s column has several excellent print pieces and two videos. Highly recommended.
If only our mayor Bloomberg had become President. I watched his interview with David Gregory on Meet The Press this past Sunday. I was engrossed. It was the best interview with any politician I’d seen anywhere anytime. You can watch it also. Caution: he advocates some gun control. Click here.
Excellent article on the AR-15 rifle used in the Sandy Hook killings. An astounding 3.3 million to 3.5 million AR-15s were made in the United States from 1986 through the first half of this year and were not exported. For the article, click here.
England versus the U.S. on gun-related homicides. From today’s Economist website, an article, “The gun control that works: no guns.” …
And, to be crude, having few guns does mean that few people get shot. In 2008-2009, there were 39 fatal injuries from crimes involving firearms in England and Wales, with a population about one sixth the size of America’s. In America, there were 12,000 gun-related homicides in 2008.
To read the piece, click here.
My friends are becoming birders. You will never see better bird photos than these. We are very lucky to live in a world where you can see these beauties. Click here.
Bill Ackman’s investing video revisited. Apparently the link to the video which I posted yesterday didn’t work for some of the day. Here’s the correct link. For his really good video on business and investing, click here. Get your kids to watch it.
I’m upgrading to an iPhone 5 today from my old iPhone4.I am also switching from AT&T to Verizon. Here are my reasons.
+ Verizon has much wider, better and faster 4G coverage than AT&T. The iPhone 5 flies on 4G. The iPhone 4 on AT&T 3G is sleepy and mostly unusable for data.
+ Verizon’s phone service works. I’m sick of getting “call failed” signals from AT&T.
+ The iPhone 5 is the first iPhone with Mobile Hotspot. That means I can get my laptop on the Internet wherever I am. That also means I can give up the Verizon MiFi broadband access card — see right hand column.
I’ll pay $90 a month, a few bucks more than with AT&T, but I’ll save the $50 a month on the MiFi, which I’ll return.
Wonderful stuff. Enjoy.
Three wise men. Christmas Story -1
They are bringing gifts to the baby Jesus in the manger. As they enter, one trips and curses, “Jesus Christ!.”
Mary looks up and says, “My goodness. And we were going to call him Moishe Finkelstein.”

Harry Newton, who likes (for speculation) IRWD, AF, SITO and WEN.



I feel that all Americans in any State/County/City should be able to wear a visible side arm. You can in Washington.
Punks and thugs are not so brave when they know it could be their ass too.
Harry, your thought on weapons is weak and not well thought out.
No better then asking Isreal to get rid of weapons cause the US will protect them.
It’s a tuff world with bad people that need a good learning. A strong show of force.
Far too many people are unarmed in this Country.
I hate your 3 wise men blasphemy. Just because most Jews have yet to recognize their Messiah doesnt mean he hasnt already come.
It’s a joke. Nothing to do with religion. No offense meant. Lighten up.
Harry VZ will charge you $20 monthly for the Hot Spot which I sometimes use on my iPhone 5 but I stop the billing via the VZ web site when I don’t need it. Works fine plus you get another 2GB of monthly usage.
I purchased the iPhone 5 on Verizon over the weekend. I can’t believe how much faster the LTE network is. Thanks for pointing out that it can become a Mobile Hotspot, I did not know that. Here is a link on how to use it but I haven’t tested it yet…http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/09/19/how-to-use-personal-hotspot-on-ios-6-and-the-iphone-5/
You will not be sorry that you switched to Verizon 4G LTE over AT&T when you uprgrade to the IPhone 5. I had the opportunity to test the IPhone 5 on both AT&T and Verizon 4G networks after the IPhone 5 came out and there was no doubt in my mind that Verizon was better based upon my personal testing. I switched from AT&T to Verizon and where I live and work their 4G LTE network is blazing fast! Have had no problems with dropped calls or slow speed on their 4G LTE network.
Steve H.
It is a mean twist of fate that Obama’s terrible liberal administration will be saved by a technology he openly resents and doesn’t support. Fraking will save the US and bury Obama’s blunders in exactly the same way that the Internet Boom saved Clinton. Fraking is hated by the EPA, not supported by any “stimulus”, harassed by regulators at every turn, and still it will save their sorry asses.
Unfortunately, this is all too true. And well said. Luck counts, as Clinton and perhaps Obama have discovered.
ummmm, where does it say that obama resents fracing? i did a google search on ‘obama resents fracing’ and all i got were articles on how obama (whose major financial support comes from the media and tech industries, but not the energy industry) is looking forward to the growing gas industry to help build the economy and that the only regulation that seems to have been passed is that gas fracers now have to disclose the chemicals they use to extract natural gas. my my, isn’t that horrible? gas drillers now have to tell their neighbors what they’re doing.